Oppose SOPA and PIPA

17 January 2012
Estimated reading time: 1 minute, 38 seconds

Why is my logo blacked out? Maybe you’ve heard that our government is trying to turn this country into a police state. The latest attacks on our freedom, or at least the biggest ones that affect us on the Internet, are SOPA and PIPA, one each for the House and the Senate.

I’d love to tell you more, but there are so many other web sites that can explain it better. I never understand all the legaleze in these government things. I’m convinced they deliberately write bills so that no one can understand them. In this case, people were paying attention. There has been discussion and protest to these bills on the Internet for quite a while.

These two bills are supposed to be about protecting copyrights and such, or so the Congress thinks, but really it just makes any web site guilty until proven innocent. I’m all for copyright protection, especially with the number of sploggers we’ve seen just in the genealogy blogger community, but even in my somewhat limited understanding of these bills, I know that they’re going about it the wrong way.

And so many web sites are going dark for 18 January 2012 to protest, including Google, Wikipedia, and Reddit. So hang on over to those sites to read more about this, if you want to know more.

So why is this blog my only site to go dark and why didn’t I make the whole thing go away? Well, if every page on every site went dark, you wouldn’t actually know what was going on because there’d be nothing to explain it. Right? OK, maybe I’m being a little bit lazy, but those big sites have been planning for this while I’ve been procrastinating. Even this blog post is less than an hour until “protest day” begins in my time zone. In any case, at least I’ve been helping to spread the word via social networking, and I’m doing it now on my blog as well.

Share on Facebook
Post on Twitter
Share on LinkedIn
Google Buzz (aka. Google Reader)
Digg This
Reddit This
Bookmark this on Delicious
Bookmark this on Technorati

Android Tablets and Genealogy

17 January 2012
Estimated reading time: 10 minutes, 9 seconds

Dick Eastman wrote an article on his blog that was just begging for a response. Someone was asking him about the Nook and the Kindle Fire for genealogy uses. He actually owns both of those devices, but went on to tell his readers that neither is good and they should buy iPad. He clearly hasn’t been paying attention to other genealogy bloggers who use Android devices, because we have just been raving about them and about the apps that can be used for genealogy. And because he uses devices that have crippled versions of the OS, he doesn’t understand what Android is capable of. In the end, he tells his readers that Android is no good and they absolutely have to buy iPad if they want to use them for genealogy. This blog post is the long version of my response: he is completely wrong.

Not So Expensive

The only tablet that is useful for genealogy programs without modification is the Apple iPad or possibly one of the more full-featured and expensive tablet computers that run the Android operating system.

Those “full-featured and expensive” Android tablets cost less than his iPad. And not only are they full-featured, they probably have more features than his iPad does. Just because the only Androids he’s ever used are crippled and require jailbreaking does not mean that he has any experience with Android.

He is correct that the Nook and Kindle (Fire) are aimed at the ebook reader market and are not as full-featured as the iPad. He is correct to tell the questioner that the iPad is better for genealogy uses. He is wrong to suggest that every other Android is just as useless as these crippled Android ebook readers.

Not So Incompatible

Neither Legacy nor Family Tree Maker have versions that will run on the Nook Tablet or the Kindle Fire nor on any other Android or iOS tablet computers.

Via Twitter, Caroline Gurney quickly pointed out that “Ancestry App allows you to do 2 way sync between Family Tree Maker 2012 database and Android device.” Also, there is an app called Families for both OSes that will read and sync with Legacy Family Tree.

Those apps may not run on his Nook or Kindle, but they certainly run on other Android and iOS tablets.

Not So Bad At Web Browsing

However, most tablet computers do have web browsers. If you are within range of a wireless network connection, you can access a web-based genealogy application. However, my guess is that most tablet computer owners will not be happy with that solution. None of the web-based genealogy programs look very good on a 7-inch screen.

Has he ever used a “real” 7″ Android tablet? Not only is he comparing two 7″ tablets to a 10″ tablet, it’s clear he’s never used any other Android 7″ tablets. I agree that web sites do look best on 10″ tablets, but they are just fine in 7″ and some don’t even need to be zoomed to be read if you have young enough eyes. (Dick may be too old to see any kind of small print.)

Not Needing Modification

Both the Nook Tablet and the Kindle Fire run modified versions of the Android Operation System.

This is true, but he still uses this against all Androids by saying that none of them are as good as his iPad.

Dick then goes on to discuss hacking the devices. He ran his “hacked” Nook off of a microSD card, so clearly he either doesn’t know how or didn’t try to hack it properly. My first tablet, a ViewSonic gTablet, required hacking to access the Android Market. I did not use a microSD card, but installed the mod right onto the tablet’s memory. There was no lagging like he experienced with his not-really-hacked Nook.

He then talks about sideloading. Again, having never used a non-crippled Android, he doesn’t realize that the Android OS allows you to sideload apps. Maybe the Nook and Kindle don’t, but every Android I’ve ever used has had the option to allow apps from somewhere other than Google’s market. It is not hidden and it is not difficult. The iPad does require jailbreaking to install anything not from the Apple store.

Not So Many Drawbacks

In my mind, modifying or hacking a device of any sort always includes some drawbacks. I’d suggest the better, simpler, and more effective method is to purchase a tablet computer or cell phone that is designed to have all sorts of third-party programs installed, including genealogy apps. Admittedly, this is usually a more expensive solution.

But he hasn’t actually done that. He’s comparing his iPad to these two other tablets, not to the “more expensive” Androids that cost less than his iPad and do more.

Not The Leading Candidates

At this time, the leading handheld candidates for using genealogy apps are the Dell Streak tablet, Samsung Galaxy Tab, the T-Mobile SpringBoard with Google tablet, the ASUS Eee Pad Transformer, the T-Mobile SpringBoard, the Apple iPad for Apple’s iOS operating system, and a wide variety of “smartphones” (cell phones that include complete computers).

Um, what? What’s a T-Mobile SpringBoard? How does he figure that’s a “leading” tablet and why did he list it twice? Not only do I know a lot about a lot of Androids, but I use T-Mobile and I’ve never heard of this one specifically. The Dell Streak is also not a “leading” tablet. He failed to mention the Acer Iconia, Toshiba Thrive, and Motorola Xoom; those along with the Asus Transformer (and the brand new Transformer Prime) and the Samsung Galaxy Tab are more like the “leading” Android tablets. The Acer and Toshiba both have full size USB ports for flash drive, external hard drive, keyboard, or mouse. Does his iPad do that? These Androids are more “full-featured” than his iPad.

Not So Lesser Known, And Some That Are

If you search online, you can find many more Android tablets although most of them are lesser-known devices.

Sure, to an iPad fanboy. Actually, there are a lot of Android devices, many of which are “lesser-known”. But that just means there are that many more options, so instead of being forced to buy the one and only model available, you can buy an Android that does what you want it to do and not what Apple thinks you should do with it. Given his “leading candidate” list, he doesn’t even know which Android tablets are lesser-known and which aren’t. Some have full size USB ports, some have full size SD card slots, the Transformer has an attachable keyboard making it like a netbook, the Thrive is built like a netbook will full size ports, etc.

Not So Outsold

The Apple iPad is by far the most popular tablet computer. In fact, Apple sells more iPads than all the other tablet manufacturers combined.

Is he using old information? The only reason no one model of Android has outsold iPhone/iPad is because there are so many to choose from that people can buy what they want and what they need, and not be forced to by the only model available. (Yes, I’m repeating myself now.)

While I can find multiple web sites that state Android is currently the dominant OS in smartphones (with varying numbers depending on the time frame), it’s harder to determine the tablet market. Most iPads have 3G and thus show activations just like smartphones, but the vast majority of Android tablets have only wi-fi. So counting activations is not a fair assessment. Also, Apple only reveals their shipment numbers, not their purchase numbers. Several sites said that Android has a greater market share in the US and worldwide, but many were before the iPhone 4S was finally released. Of course, many people buy the iPhone for the “prestige” and not because they’ve compared it to an Android. My favorite find, while looking for a statistics link, was this article from, well, tomorrow (according to when I first wrote this), stating that Steve Wozniak, Apple’s co-founder, prefers his Android to his iPhone for the features it offers, including Android’s voice features over the much-hyped Siri app.

Not So Few Genealogy Apps

Dick Eastman (the cause of this rant blog post) goes on to link to an earlier article of his about genealogy apps for iPhone/iPad. Tamura Jones has recently compiled lists of Free Android Genealogy Apps and Paid Android Genealogy Apps. There are a lot more apps for Android users. Maybe not for Dick with his crippled Nook and Kindle, but for the rest of us.

Not So Unrepetitious

In short, anyone who wants to use a full-featured genealogy program on a tablet computer needs to purchase an Apple iPad (which has many genealogy programs available) or one of the “leading handheld candidates” listed earlier that run Android (and will then be limited to only two or three genealogy programs). However, none of these choices can match the low prices of the Nook Tablet or of a Kindle Fire.

Again, he mentions those leading candidates that I’ve already pointed out are incorrect, and thinks they are limited to two or three programs, which Tamura proves is incorrect.

While the original question was about two tablets that Dick actually owns, the Nook and the Kindle Fire, he did not even offer a comparison of the two. Instead, he compared them both to his iPad. The two tablets are not even in the same league or remotely within the same price point as the iPad. If he wants to compare an iPad to something, he should try a 10″ Android that hasn’t been crippled by its manufacturer to be just an ereader.

He is also wrong about the prices of Android tablets. I purchased my 7″ Galaxy Tab for the same price as the Kindle Nook. Because Apple controls the iPads, they have set the prices. But Androids can be purchased from a variety of sellers, sometimes refurbished, but working like they are new.

To have a really fair comparison for Nook and Kindle, he should have compared them to other 7″ tablets. But wait, Apple doesn’t make one. There are no options in iOS for something the size of an ereader, and sometimes the size and weight of it is the big draw. No, he’d have to compare to the 7″ Samsung Galaxy Tab, the HTC Flyer, or the Dell Streak. The HTC seemed a little overpriced to me. The cell providers don’t sell the old Galaxy Tab, but there is a newer version now, that with a two year activation, would probably cost about the same as the Nook and Kindle. Does the iPad cost less with the activation like the Androids do? This I don’t know.

Conclusion

Just because Dick Eastman has been blogging about technology for so many years doesn’t mean he’s always right. And even if he owns the devices in question, it doesn’t means he answers his readers’ questions about them, other than to steer the reader towards a device that was not even a possibility in their mind.

Also, as of the posting of this blog, he has not approved of any of the comments that have been left, as I know for a fact that there have been at least three. Does he not like to be told he’s wrong on his own blog? Possibly. I don’t know. Maybe he’s been busy since sending it out into the social networking world.

If the reader of EOGN wants to buy a more inexpensive and smaller Android tablet for genealogy uses, I recommend the 7″ Galaxy Tab, which can be purchased refurbished for about the same price as a Kindle Fire. If willing to spend a bit more, and wanting a 10″ tablet, the Asus Transformer refurbished is available as of this moment for only $300. Take a little time to research the tablets and find the options that you want. I have purchased all of my Androids on woot.com and deals.woot.com; I purchased each from a different seller whose deal was listed on that site.

Sorry Dick, but in this case, you should have asked your readers to answer for you. You just don’t appear to have enough experience with real Androids to answer.

Share on Facebook
Post on Twitter
Share on LinkedIn
Google Buzz (aka. Google Reader)
Digg This
Reddit This
Bookmark this on Delicious
Bookmark this on Technorati

SLC 2014 – Planning Begins

13 January 2012
Estimated reading time: 1 minute, 36 seconds

I had a couple of meetings this week with Hal Bookbinder and Michael Brenner, my co-chairs for the IAJGS conference in 2014 in Salt Lake City. I met up with them at the Hilton for a tour of the facility, to refresh our memories from the 2007 conference held there. They were running late, so I joined them for lunch first. After the tour, we discussed many details and brainstormed quite a bit. Hal and Mike were the co-chairs for the 2007 conference, and I was involved as Resource Room coordinator, so we all have many things still relatively fresh in our minds from that conference.

We discussed asking some of the specific volunteers to step up again in their jobs because they did good the last time, and we discussed using different volunteers for some other things because of the things they had done since 2007. I learned a lot more about what goes on behind the scenes to plan a conference.

Some of the things we discussed, I responded with, “if all goes well with UJGS…” A few days earlier, UJGS had our first board meeting. Ever. All three of us. So my small board is now aware of our goal of pushing for more local membership and some of the ways we want to go about doing that. With our plans, hopefully we’ll have a few volunteers in our society who already have some of the contacts and experience to step into these conference supporting roles with almost no extra effort.

The next morning, we had a meeting at the Family History Library to let them know we were coming and to coordinate a few things with them.

It feels like a good start. I finally felt like I was included in the planning. We all seem to work together well and generally agree on things. I look forward to losing giving much of the next two years to the conference.

Share on Facebook
Post on Twitter
Share on LinkedIn
Google Buzz (aka. Google Reader)
Digg This
Reddit This
Bookmark this on Delicious
Bookmark this on Technorati

The Insider’s Guide to the Family History Library and SLC

11 January 2012
Estimated reading time: 9 minutes, 54 seconds

Salt Lake City is about to be descended upon my a few thousand genealogists and technologists. As I see people posing questions and writing comments on various blogs, I have answered a few. Thus, I’ve decided to write this blog post.

If it’s your first time to the Family History Library, or you just haven’t been back in a while, you may feel overwhelmed when you first enter the library. There is an orientation you can try, but you still won’t be sure of yourself until you get started. There are lots of volunteers to help you. If they try to give you research advice, be wary. Many missionaries try to help, but you might know far more about doing research. If they help you with finding films/books or using readers/scanners, that part they should be good at.

Five Floors

Upon entering the FHL, you are on the Main floor. This floor has computers, histories, and a junk food room. I spend little time on this floor myself, except when I need a break and a chocolate bar. They have several machines ranging from drinks (soda, milk, juices, water), chocolate and chips and snack foods, microwaveable meals, and one ice cream machine.

All floors have restrooms and water fountains in the same place, rows of computers, at least a few extra tables, microfilm readers and scanners (except for the third floor), printers/scanners, an information desk, and a library access services office. (Note that the information desk on the main floor rarely has any of the kind of information I try to ask them for. Other floors are more useful for specific research questions.)

Upstairs is US and Canada research. The second floor has microfilm and microfiche. The third floor has books. If you need to see any books, make sure you check them because they can’t be ordered to your local Family History Centers (that I’m aware of).

Downstairs is International (B-1) and British Isles/Australia/New Zealand (B-2).

Do your research at the microfilm readers then go to the scanners only to make scans/copies of records you have found. This will keep you from annoying other people by taking time at the scanners while they are waiting. I often go straight to the scanners when copying records that are indexed. Just be sure you are familiar with how to find the page you need if you do that.

The scanners can scan directly to flash drive or you can also print for $.05 per copy (or $.10 for big pages, I believe; I don’t usually print). There are machines from which to buy copy cards. The scanners have a learning curve, so ask for help. There are also instructional pages in the scanner area. The person working next to you might help also.

Can You Avoid Crowds?

Before, during, and after RootsTech, it will probably be crowded. SLIG attendees will also be there the week before. If you find the US/Canada floor too crowded, try the International floor, or the British floor, where there are often fewer people.

How To Prepare -or- Where Are My Films?

Prepare in advance what you want to look at. Don’t just figure out which families you want to research, check the FHL catalog and have film numbers and book call numbers ready to go.

The FHL is a help-yourself facility. You need to find your own films, fiches, and books, and then replace them when you are done. So don’t overdo it when you take films. They recommend up to five at a time, but only take that many if you’ll be quick with them; remember others might want to use the same films too. Microfilm drawers are labeled with the first film number in the drawer. Some people will sometimes mark the drawers with magnetic things or post-its for refiling. Try not to be dyslexic while refiling and double check that you’ve boxed the correct film in the correct box. (I had a scavenger hunt across four boxes once to find a mis-filed film reel.)

If you can’t find your film in the correct drawer (and there’s no gap like someone is using it), you need to check Overflow. At the end of the films (you’ll see the order), some drawers are marked with pink film numbers. Those are the overflow drawers. If you can’t find your film in order or in overflow, and it’s not in the vault, it’s usually in high density. So keep reading.

Fiche are also borrowed and returned to their drawers; there are red marker cards above the drawers to mark your place. Books should be returned to the red shelves, but if I just look at it while standing by the shelf, I often just put it back. Many books are in high density on the International floor. (I don’t know about British books.) Keep in mind that when you grab a book from the shelf, you are in the location/topic, so you might look at what else is there even if you didn’t see the listings in the catalog.

If a film says that it’s in the Vault, order it ahead of time. (Ooh, that’s a form I hadn’t seen before.) It takes only a day or two to get a film from the vault, but they can only do so many per day, so don’t overwork them during the conference for films you know you need before you arrive. If your research leads you to a vault film when you’re still around for another day or two, then go ahead and order it.

Sometimes the catalog will specify High Density or to visit Access Services (or sometimes it won’t and you have to check there anyway). Do not fret! (I’ve seen people panic.) High density is in the building on the B-1 floor. It takes them maybe five minutes to get your film. Access services is a small office with glass windows on every floor near the scanners. If the catalog says access services, it may mean the records are restricted and they will hold your government-issued ID while you have the film/fiche, or it may be in high density. Anything you get from high density or access services should be returned to them; don’t try to put the films into drawers.

Outside There’s A City

You may feel cooped up inside and want to know what’s outside the buildings. Between the conference center and the FHL, JB’s Restaurant is noticeably attached to the lobby of the Plaza hotel. There is a restaurant in the lobby of the Radisson hotel. The Hilton has a couple restaurants, and there are plenty on other streets nearby. The Gateway is an outdoor mall just down the street from all of this and they have lots of restaurants.

You can use Trax to get around a bit. It is our light rail system. There is a convenient station called Temple Square for the Plaza, FHL, Salt Palace convention center, and the Radisson (and Temple Square too). The Arena Station can work for the Radisson also. In downtown, we are in the free fare zone, so Trax and buses won’t cost anything within those boundaries. The Gallivan station is on the street directly behind the Hilton (if your hotel is out that way); you just have to find a path through the buildings and parking lots. (I know for a fact there was a shortcut through to the Hilton in 2007.) The Planetarium station brings you to the front of Gateway, but the next one or two stops might also be good.

Just remember that, if you live by Murphy’s law (like I do), waiting for Trax and walking will often take the same time. Last year, I opted to walk to the Planetarium with a friend instead of waiting. Trax arrived at the same time we did.

What’s In Temple Square?

Temple Square is home to the Mormon Salt Lake Temple and the Tabernacle. (You’ve probably heard of the Mormon Tabernacle Choir.) It’s open from 9am-9pm every day. Besides those two buildings, there are several other buildings and gardens. In the south visitor center, they have a model of the Temple; it’s the only way a non-Mormon will ever see the inside. I can’t tell you a whole lot of details, but there’s this web site to read more about it, including info about the four restaurants and choir performances and rehearsals (8pm Thursdays).

How’s The Weather?

SLC is in a drought. We’ve had very, very little snow this year. I see two possibilities. 1. It will stay this way. 2. Murphy will visit and dump a huge snowstorm on us just in time for your visit. One forecast is saying a possibility for rain/snow on the 19th or 20th of January. They don’t predict far enough in advance for February. Either way, bring a jacket, gloves, hat, whatever you like for winter. Even if there’s no snow, it’s cold. I don’t have a heavy coat; I layer instead. And wear comfortable shoes. A block in downtown SLC is probably multiple blocks in your city, and there’s also a good deal of walking just in the convention center.

Anything I missed that I should mention? Let me know and maybe I’ll add a section to this blog post.

Additional FHL Details

Is There Wi-fi?

There is free wi-fi available from the FHL. A quick accepting of the terms in a web browser will get you connected. They block a few things; consider that it’s run by a religious organization and they probably try to block the same things as public libraries and schools. Unfortunately, they block the standard email ports so I can’t get to my regular mail, but I can get to gmail with no problem. (I have my own hosting, so probably very few people will have the email issue I do.) Besides my email, it’s extremely rare for me to find something blocked.

Can I Bring My Own Computer?

Absolutely. I have seen all kinds of computers, tablets, and cameras. Some people leave their computers by the readers and walk away; I suggest doing that only if it’s locked down. There are outlets behind the microfilm readers, but some are harder to reach than others. Some tables have plugs built in, but I don’t think they are all connected.

I already mentioned they have lots of computers that everyone can use to access the catalog, subscription databases, or any web sites. Just don’t forget your flash drive in a computer. As in the real world, I think most people are honest and would turn it in to lost and found, but I forgot one once and never got it back. Also, you might want put your name on the flash drive or the lanyard; the employees will not check the drive to see if there’s a name on it.

Will My Cell Phone Work?

There is average cell phone service in the building, the quality of which depends on your carrier and phone. I never get a signal in the basement. If you’re on Verizon, you’re in luck because there is a repeater in the basement. Try to remember to put your phone on silent and step away to the elevator area if you take any calls so as not to annoy others.

What Else Can I Bring?

I have seen rolling suitcases, binders, charts, even extra tables set up next to film readers. I don’t think anything is restricted, except maybe proselytizing. And no, they won’t try to sell you on their religion while you’re in the FHL. If you want to know more about the LDS church, there’s plenty of other nearby places to go instead.

And since RootsTech is in winter, I’ll mention that there are coat racks on every floor. Or you can just drape your coat over your chair.

Share on Facebook
Post on Twitter
Share on LinkedIn
Google Buzz (aka. Google Reader)
Digg This
Reddit This
Bookmark this on Delicious
Bookmark this on Technorati

Genealogy Goals For 2012

5 January 2012
Estimated reading time: 2 minutes, 54 seconds

This seems to be a common genealogy blog topic, so here’s my go. I didn’t do goals for last year, so I can’t judge them.

In 2011, I made my business paperless by using Android. I tried previously with my PDA but it didn’t work. I finally finished scanning all the family photos that had been given to me years ago and I organized all my photos on my computer. I began re-organizing all my genealogy documents, but only got part way when I switched to the photos. At the beginning of the year, I reprogrammed my family web site, but now I need to add the photos back in. Since they’re organized, it should be easier, but I haven’t gotten to it yet.

And that brings me to my goals for 2012.

1. Go to Europe.

The IAJGS conference is in Paris in 2012. However, it’s losing it’s appeal to me for a few reasons. A cousin of mine is going to Poland and has arranged for a day tour of our ancestral town. It is almost exactly one month before the conference, so to go to both, I’d have to stay in Europe for over a month or fly home and back in the same month. Both options are not appealing to me. But if I skip the conference, I can easily plan for a June trip.

2. Organize my documents.

I started this in 2011. Then my cousin asked about pictures on the web site and I switched to organizing those, which I finished. Now I have to get back to the documents, making sure everything has a good digital copy and is sourced better in my program.

3. Get pictures on the family web site.

I finished organizing them. Now I have to write the programming to link them up to the database and then get them on the web site.

4. Blog more.

I’ve had some busy times, then some slow times. Also, I started another blog to post a picture a day. It started really well, but December was terrible and I skipped days all over the place. There will also be a new society blog for me to keep up with very soon. Also, don’t leave off Nitpicker’s Versions of WDYTYA episodes until the next season starts. Again. Yes, I know I still have one more to do.

Business Goals

1. Don’t procrastinate emails.

I end up taking upwards of an hour sometimes to answer an initial genealogy inquiry, so I tend to procrastinate on those. Like my photo blog, it got much worse in December. I had 100 near the end of the year. I have less than 30 now in my inbox, and still several that need answering. But at least none are a month old anymore.

2. Invoice better.

This also includes for my web development business.

I have some other smaller things, but they fall in line with not procrastinating emails and updating my family web site. I did improve on some things last year, so now I get another chance to improve even more.

Also, just writing this blog post means I’m blogging more, right? :-)

————-

Late addition: Index more.

I forgot about this one. (Kind of like I keep forgetting to index the pages I already have?) I’m part of one indexing project and I haven’t been doing much lately. I need to finish the pages I’ve got and do more. I also want to get my society indexing, so I assume I’ll be doing at least some of that too.

Share on Facebook
Post on Twitter
Share on LinkedIn
Google Buzz (aka. Google Reader)
Digg This
Reddit This
Bookmark this on Delicious
Bookmark this on Technorati

Review – MyHeritage App

15 December 2011
Estimated reading time: 5 minutes, 49 seconds

MyHeritage released an API and started a programming contest for it a few months ago. I considered trying for it but knew it was probably a waste of my time because they were likely working on the app that I had in mind. And today it was released. I immediately downloaded it after their Twitter account sent out the link to the press release. I wonder why they sent out a link to a tech site before the press release on their own blog. I didn’t see a link to the market in the press release until I checked the one on their blog, but I found the app in the market.

On the first try, the app told me I needed Adobe AIR. Especially since the press release mentioned HTML5, and their other apps all require it as well, I knew that was going to be the case. But they failed to mention that in the description. Sorry, if I require some other app on my device to run yours, you have to tell me before I try yours. This is one reason they’ve gotten some negative reviews for their other app. Not only do people not like AIR, but they don’t even tell you that you need it.

So I installed AIR and the app loaded very slowly. I thought it had crashed because the screen was black for so long, but it got faster after the next restart. I imagine it was setting up files on my Android but didn’t tell me what it was doing. I don’t even know if it was AIR or MyHeritage that took so long to start.

I think they’ve combined all of their apps into one. There are three main options: Family Tree, Share Photos, and MyCeleb.

Family Tree

I went for the first option, logged in, and had access to my tree. This seemed to work well, though the usual zoom in and out gestures did not work and I had to click on the + and – symbols. It is a little slow loading, so I think it fetches my tree every time I open it. The main view is similar to the main family tree view on their web site, showing the graphical interface of the tree. Tapping on an individual brings up a different view with three options for Info, Events, and Family. The family list shows, in order, spouse, children, then parents, and you can click on each of them. I checked someone with two spouses and it listed them out of order. The database doesn’t have marriage dates for either, but they are in order in my program.

There is an option to turn off the upper menu and the search function to see a little more of the tree at once. This also flips to landscape mode as it should.

I shut off the wifi to see if the app cached any information, but it did not even let me into this part of the app without a connection. Because my Androids are not phones/have no data plans, this would not be helpful anywhere without wifi, for instance, if I was in a cemetery and found curious gravestones nearby and wanted to investigate my family tree. Assuming a constant Internet connection is a regular occurrence among Android apps, unfortunately. In my opinion, if you need the Internet, why bother programming an app? How about just do a mobile-specialized web site?

Share Photos

The Share photos section brought up the pictures that I’ve uploaded to the site. The camera icon lets me take a photo or choose from the library on the device. The share icon (though Android usually uses a different icon; maybe this is a standard iOS icon) gives me the options to share photo or save to camera roll. I don’t know what the second option actually did. The first doesn’t do anything for me. It seems that the option is for sharing with people who can already access the tree on the web site but I have no other people there. It gave me the option to add emails within the app, but I didn’t follow through.

Flipping to landscape mode here lost all the functionality of sharing or taking photos and I could just look through the photos. On the Galaxy Tab 7″, the photos fell off the side of the tab. On the Galaxy S Wifi 5.0, they were centered properly.

MyCeleb

MyCeleb let me choose a photo or take one. I had my usual photo on my Android and it matched me the same as the web site had. I don’t want to discuss the results I got from snapping a picture, but it seemed to work. This part of the app works exclusively in portrait mode.

Programming Issues

Probably in part, or entirely, because it’s programmed in AIR, it doesn’t always work like a regular Android app. The back button often doesn’t do anything, though in every other app it either closes whatever has opened, it goes back to the previous view, or it eventually closes the app. Sometimes it did go back, but very often it did not, for instance, any smaller pop-up windows did not close and I could not exit the app via the back button. The Android menu button also does nothing in the app. To close the app, I had to use the in-app menu button.

I Have Email

While writing this review, I received an email from MyHeritage, likely activated when I logged in via the app. It states “now the whole family can contribute to your family site… and stay in touch via iPhone, iPad, and Android.” Well, how? I guess they mean mostly the photo sharing, because the email specifies that v1.0 is read-only for the family tree section. They also claim more features are “in the works”. I assume they mean writing and editing abilities in the tree, but they don’t say what else. We’ll just have to watch for that.

Conclusion

Overall, the app seems to work pretty well. Some things lagged, in part probably because it was setting itself up or it had to access the Internet. My tree showed up and I was able to move around it and view individuals’ details. It doesn’t remember my data for offline use. I didn’t log out, so it remembered me each time I restarted it.

I still have a lot more information in my own program that wasn’t in the GEDCOM that got uploaded to MyHeritage. I don’t know how much more data would show up in this app if I had all kinds of odd events and notes in there; it might show those or it might just show the “normal” events, like the ones I included. I still want to try out some of those options on the web site, so I will remember to check out the app again when I do that to see if it can access more data.

Share on Facebook
Post on Twitter
Share on LinkedIn
Google Buzz (aka. Google Reader)
Digg This
Reddit This
Bookmark this on Delicious
Bookmark this on Technorati

UJGS Library Research Night

16 November 2011
Estimated reading time: 2 minutes, 47 seconds

Tonight was the first Library Research Night for the Utah Jewish Genealogical Society. We had nothing else planned during International Jewish Genealogy Month, so it seemed like the perfect month for it.

I was expecting Todd Knowles to be around to help out, but he stayed down on the British floor, where he works, and said he was helping people down there. Seems to me that if he was doing that, he was just doing his regular job.

On the International floor, I had a few people come in for help with their research. Mary Ann Jacobs and her daughter arrived, and they pretty much worked together for the evening. Marelynn Zipser was also around, though she was struggling with difficult German. Margarita Choquette offered to help with anyone needing Russian help and Heidi offered to return to help with German. Since most people were asking for US help, I covered the room and didn’t ask them to come back.

Rich Laniewsky came in with a simple question: what was his grandmother’s name. Unfortunately, we didn’t have records for the town, but he learned how to use the catalog and the microfilm reader to look at some records for a nearby town. I suggested he order the SS-5, which he thinks he already has somewhere.

I have already forgotten what Gary Bowen needed help with. I helped him out a bit and he went to do some work at the computer.

Sue Bradley needed help in US records. I sent her up to the US floor for a Wisconsin birth index, but she couldn’t find anything. We did a bit of searching online for some more information, eventually finding a Los Angeles death record to look for. She had a little trouble with the index and had someone on the floor help her. Unfortunately, sometimes their help just wastes time. I think she had the right film, but will have to check it another time because I didn’t abandon the room until late and we didn’t have time to try again when I found her. Her Ancestry search of the California Death Index didn’t specify if the death was in the city or the county, or it would have made things easier. I’ve already had issues with the separate Los Angeles City and County films, so I’m not surprised there was some trouble.

Ruth and Dick Stone wanted some help locating someone born in Hungary. We weren’t entirely sure of the town, but in trying to find another document that mentioned it, they got the naturalization for her husband. It had her birth year far off and stated her birth location just simply as Hungary, so it didn’t help much. On the other hand, we noticed his last foreign residence and they are going to try searching there.

Todd told me he helped five people down on B-2, where he pretty much recruited them to show up for the night. I hope to get a full report from him. And next time, I want everyone to meet on the same floor, which should probably be the US floor. I sent people up there more often than I sent them out for international records. I wonder if we can get a computer and a film reader in a classroom the next time. It would make it so much easier.

Share on Facebook
Post on Twitter
Share on LinkedIn
Google Buzz (aka. Google Reader)
Digg This
Reddit This
Bookmark this on Delicious
Bookmark this on Technorati

Veteran’s Day

11 November 2011
Estimated reading time: 1 minute, 17 seconds

I wasn’t prepared with a post for today. Heather Wilkinson Rojo, over at Nutfield Genealogy, also posting on Google+, challenged other bloggers to post transcriptions of the names on local war memorials. I went out and took more pictures of the memorials in Kearns. I didn’t realize I already had a picture of all the names on the memorial from August; I wanted to be sure I got them all.

There are several memorials together at the corner where the “Welcome to Kearns” sign stands.

Kearns Memorial

Donated July 1979 to Town of Kearns
30th Anniversary
by
Kearns American Legion
Post 132
World War I cannon

Original flag pole that marked gateway to
Army Air Force Training Command
Camp Kearns
July 20, 1942 – Sept. 2, 1945

Vietnam Memorial

The community honors all the brave Kearns men who served with the
Armed Forces of the United States during these trying times. 1963 – 1973.
Erected 1984.

Killed in Action

For these brave Kearns youth who gave the supreme sacrifice – killed in action.

Richard T. Trujillo, CPL USMC, 7 June 1966
Curtis B. Bugger, PFC SUMC, 21 January 1968
Bill N. Dalton, PFC USMC, 8 February 1968
Michael M. Clayton, L CPC USMC, 20 April 1968
Steven M. Connell, PFC USMC, 26 November 1968
Douglas J. Sommer, PFC US Army, 23 May 1969
Robert K. Worthen, PFC US Army, 21 November 1969
Michael D. Brown, CPL US Army, 27 April 1970
Lewis R. Yates, SGT US Army, 7 February 1971

 

Camp Kearns Memorial

Share on Facebook
Post on Twitter
Share on LinkedIn
Google Buzz (aka. Google Reader)
Digg This
Reddit This
Bookmark this on Delicious
Bookmark this on Technorati

Reviews – RestingSpot and BillionGraves

9 November 2011
Estimated reading time: 11 minutes, 38 seconds

Brett Atlas of Resting Spot emailed me via my blog a while back. I was mostly ignoring such web sites, knowing that FindaGrave has been around for a long time, and why were others repeating it? But his extra effort caught my attention and I decided to check it out. I had to wait a bit for it to be available for Android. He offered me a pre-release version, but in the end, it was released before I made it out to a cemetery. I decided to try Billion Graves at the same time, since they seemed so similar.

The first part of this review was written months ago. I finished after finally visiting a cemetery and trying the apps, so some of the other stuff might be a little different by now.

Signing Up

I signed up for both online. BillionGraves asked me for a user name and RestingSpot asked for my real name. I received emails from both immediately. BG sent me a link to confirm my email that went to a blank page (but apparently it worked), and included a link to “tips and tricks” without a warning that it was a PDF. RS had a simpler email, and I had to copy and paste the link to activate. (Why my program didn’t make it clickable anyway, I’ll never know.)

First Impressions of the Web Sites

Logging into RS essentially brought me back to their home page and I had to search to find anything. I tried Utah and Salt Lake City with no results. Well, at least my work hadn’t been done yet. There is nothing on the site telling how the stones get transcribed so they are searchable by name. I searched by Smith and the first listing had a location on the map but no picture. I found one listing that had a description directing me to FindaGrave for more information.

BG brought me to a dashboard. I curiously clicked on “Photo Map” and was taken to a satellite image of… the middle of nowhere. Zooming out, I was in the Uinta Forest in Utah. I wonder why? Clicking on the “Transcribe” tab, I was presented an image and a short form to fill in. It seemed easy, but when I clicked “Save”, it stayed on the same image. I had to choose “Next” to move on. It then gave me several completely unreadable images before another I could transcribe. It had a lot of bad and blurry pictures and fed them to me at random. There were more unreadable pictures than readable ones. One wasn’t even in English.

Curiously, one of the options for the data entry is the FamilySearch ID. The owners are clearly LDS, and living in Utah. (What does this mean for people who don’t have that ID? Will they be entered into the database and be marked for posthumous baptism?)

Also, for having 2400 photos that need transcribing, it repeated an awful lot of them back to me that I skipped over, even after I reported them for being blurry or not a gravestone. Later visits to the site gave me different stones, many more of which were readable. I guess my first visit had a lot of leftovers.

The Android Apps

Both apps defaulted to the portrait view, which didn’t thrill me on my tablet device, but plenty of apps don’t have the correct rotation.

This is where they diverge. I discovered the answer to my biggest question: What is the difference between the two sites? BG has you take pictures really fast, upload them, and let someone else type in the transcription. RS has you enter the information while you’re there. Considering that I had to log in to both twice because I mis-typed, that doesn’t sound like the best solution for cataloging whole cemeteries. BG says you can photograph 500 graves in an hour, but if I stop to type each one, there’s no way I’ll get that much done in RS.

On the other hand, I couldn’t read the majority of the photos on BG (my first visit) because the stones were worn down or the pictures were blurry (I think it gave me the same one more than once to try). However, some of those could probably be read in person, so filling in the information while you’re standing there would be better in those cases.

I shot off an email to Brett about adding photos since I didn’t even see the option. He replied about what I thought. After adding the name (and getting the GPS coordinates), then there is an option to add a photo.

Even Before I Do the Work

I already know I’m not going to be thrilled with RS. That one will take hours in a cemetery because I have to catalog the whole thing there. And if someone else finds a gravestone that I am looking for, they might not have even taken a picture.

On the other hand, I’ve already witnessed some flaws in BG. Too many pictures were illegible. And even some of the clear pictures could not be read for transcribing. There is also the problem about needing multiple pictures for some grave sites, which BG doesn’t allow. I was shown pictures of the backs of stones several times, but there’s nothing to transcribe if I don’t know who’s on the front.

Ideally

There needs to be a middle ground. One or both of these apps needs to move towards the other. I like the idea of BillionGraves in that someone can go out with their device and snap pictures quickly, recording the GPS, and then it can be transcribed later. But given the difficulty in reading some photos and specifically reading the gravestones, there needs to be an option more like RestingSpot where the person taking the photo, at the time they take it, can enter the data because they can see the writing more clearly in person. Also, BG needs to allow more than one photo, like it appears that RS can do. I have seen evidence that both are listening to what users are suggesting. I just wonder which one will make the bigger move first and make the adjustments needed to take the lead.

Finally Visited the Cemeteries

Two months after writing the previous part of this blog post, I finally found myself downtown during daylight with a little time. I headed up to the small Jewish cemetery first. It seems that Google maps has it wrong, because I clearly was not in a Jewish cemetery. There was another section without its own road to drive, but I didn’t make it over there. Besides the mysterious cemetery, I tried out the Android apps. No longer using the larger Android tablet, the portrait view made more sense on the smaller device. In addition, the smaller screen brings a smaller keyboard and more typos.

RestingSpot and the Forced Crashes

I tried RestingSpot first. I found the app very unresponsive. I would sometimes tap things multiple times before anything would happen. I entered a name, misspelling it repeatedly, then went to the date fields. When I typed in the date, it didn’t save. I had to tap the + and – buttons to get the year to take instead of ending up with 1900 and 2000. Then the app crashed. I started again a number of times with the app crashing. I was even able to take a photo. But in the end, it crashed and nothing saved.

I contacted Brett about my results before this blog entry was posted. They are constantly working to improve the app and have asked me to help test the next version. They were already working on a couple of my issues.

While I’d been in a mixed religion cemetery before, I never really paid attention and just went to the Jewish section where I was looking for someone. While Jewish cemeteries (in the US) have stones with Hebrew, non-Jewish apparently can have anything. The question becomes, when the app is finally fixed so that it works with my device, how would I even enter the data on stones like these?

Chinese, I think

Arabic, I imagine

Can the apps even handle such characters if I could read them? (Can either app handle non-Latin letters?) How could I catalog a cemetery on-site if I can’t read some of it? (OK, some of the Chinese stones had English on the back, but that Arabic one was all on the front.)

BillionGraves and the Greed

BillionGraves was up next. I opened it up, chose “Camera”, snapped pictures, and moved on. I only did a few, but it was quick. I had to wait a few seconds every time I moved, for GPS I assume, but it wasn’t bad. I had preview on and the pictures looked good. When I had wifi again, I uploaded them and it figured out the cemetery by the GPS coordinates.

Because I don’t have 3G or 4G, I didn’t have a connection while in the cemetery, so I didn’t notice that BG was running ads. What I did notice was the “Records” screen. They want me to pay for their service. I go out and photograph stones for free for them, I transcribe what other people have photographed for free, everyone contributes without pay, but they want me to pay to search their database? I think not. I can forgive ads on the web site and in the app, because they are providing the service, programming, and hosting, but taking all the information they are given freely and making me pay for it is not acceptable.

Conclusions

I stand by my previous conclusions that neither app is ideal.

BillionGraves Positives

1. Snapping photos was quick and easy. A lot of graves can be covered in a short time.

BillionGraves Negatives

1. Some grave sites require more than one photo, either because the stone has writing on front and back, there is a large stone with the surname and smaller stones for each individual in the plot, or just because the sunlight is reflecting badly and it needs more than one photo. BillionGraves does not allow multiple photos to be linked together for one record.

2. Not everyone keeps the preview mode on, so they don’t even see the bad quality of the photos they are uploading.

3. Some gravestones are difficult to read, but easier to see in person. There is no way to enter the information or attach a note to a gravestone when the photo is taken.

4. After the photos were taken, my default image viewer could not find them. When I take normal camera pictures, they are immediately cataloged. BG didn’t do that and it took restarting my device to activate the media scan to find them.

5. All information on the site is photographed and transcribed by volunteers, yet they want us to pay to access it within the mobile app.

RestingSpot Positives

1. Multiple images can be attached to a single record, which is sometimes necessary for gravestones.

2. You can create a memorial page, like FindaGrave, but with the GPS coordinates.

3. The app appears to be completely free. No ads (in the Android app), no requiring payment to search.

4. If a stone is difficult to read in the photo, you can enter the data while in person, when it’s easier to read.

RestingSpot Negatives

1. The app was incompatible with my Android, force closing multiple times. I never got a single grave completely recorded and uploaded.

2. Entering all the data on-site is tedious and prone to typos.

3. If a stone is in a language or alphabet I can’t read, I can’t enter it at all.

4. Searching within the app did not produce any results. I double checked with the online search. I guess that isn’t working yet either.

5. My default image viewer could see the files after they were taken, but I found the RS images in the root directory. They should really be in a folder. Of course, the app crashed, so maybe it wasn’t finished and would have moved them.

Final Analysis

One of these programs needs to take a huge step towards the other. BillionGraves is good that I can take a lot of pictures quickly and they get transcribed later. This is also good for stones in foreign languages that I can’t read. But when the stone is hard to read or requires multiple photos, RestingSpot has the advantage. In person, I can read the difficult stones better, and I can add multiple pictures together.

The BG Android app worked fine, but the RS crashed. I verified that I have the current versions of both apps. I’ve never contacted the BG owners/developers. The RS owners are already working on some of the issues I was having and said they are working on a big update set for about six months from now.

I’m still partial to RestingSpot for a few biased reasons, and one major one.

1. Brett contacted me personally.

2. The owners have been indexing Jewish cemeteries in Omaha with the community. (Hence, why they were contacting Jewish genealogy bloggers.)

3. I don’t have to wonder if the information will eventually be entered into the FamilySearch database for posthumous baptisms.

4. BG is trying to charge people to access data that has been volunteered for free. I have seen no evidence of this from RS. Using ads for some revenue is one thing, charging for access to the data is another.

I volunteered to help RestingSpot test future versions of their Android app. I look forward to watching as they iron out the issues and improve the app over time. I hope that I can write a follow-up review next spring about the improvements they’ve made and how long it really takes to enter the data at the grave sites.

Have you tried the apps? What do you think of them?

Share on Facebook
Post on Twitter
Share on LinkedIn
Google Buzz (aka. Google Reader)
Digg This
Reddit This
Bookmark this on Delicious
Bookmark this on Technorati

Review Update – Geni.com

7 November 2011
Estimated reading time: 4 minutes, 32 seconds

I haven’t really been using Geni much since my review in February. Some things have happened since then. In August, they changed the rules to allow Pro members to merge with any accounts they wanted. They soon added a Plus membership. And now they’ve changed the rules again.

The latest major changes are to limit the number of family members in the free account and to take away the auto-merging for Pro members. After all the immediate backlash about the auto-merging, they waited for months to change it back. I understood why they did it, and even suggested a better solution.

My Solution

For the record, I suggested an auto-merge for Pro members after a limited time. I’m sure there are plenty of abandoned trees on the site that members might want to merge with, which was probably one reason why they did that. I suggested that after a merge request was ignored for an amount of time, maybe a few weeks, that the Pro member could then merge the trees and the abandoned one wouldn’t quite be so abandoned anymore. That would also prevent someone from auto-merging to an active or semi-active member without confirmation. But alas, they didn’t listen.

I was especially opposed to the auto-merging because right before they initiated it, someone suggested a merge to my tree that wasn’t even close to a match. If he’d done that later and with a Pro account, then I’d have to figure out how to undo it. I know they said it would be like a wiki and reversible, but I don’t think they had that in place right away, if ever.

62 !> 100

Although offered a free Pro membership a couple of times, I’ve never actually been given that upgrade. I didn’t pursue it enough, it seems. So today, on a whim, I logged in again. And what do I find? I’ve exceeded my 100 person limit. I wonder how they figure that.

I did not upload my GEDCOM because they couldn’t read my file properly and took the upload function away by the time I tried again. When I go to my main family page, it shows me 67 people. When I go to my lists and view people added by me, there are only 62. So how does Geni figure that I’ve exceeded my limit of 100 if I’ve only added 62? Because I’ve merged with other trees and there are 225 connected? That is not me exceeding the 100 limit. Their original purpose was to merge everyone, so are they now saying that everyone must have a Pro account because we all exceed our limits if we merge at all?

In addition to the 225 family members I have, Geni is also telling me that I am connected to 60 million. That’s new to me. I don’t remember merging with the borg tree, or anyone else in my family. I know where I can connect to it, but I’ve never entered that data into my tree and I’ve never merged with that part of my family.

Share it or Download it?

Downloading my data is tricky too. I’m not sure if it’s always been this hidden, but why is the download my GEDCOM option under the menu to “share” my tree? That took me too long to find. And for 62, or 225 (or 60 million?) people, the export is pretty slow. In fact, hours later, it’s still pending.

I’ve also got pending merges waiting, except that they’re on profiles I don’t manage. This is not new, but really, why is Geni still bugging me with those?

Geni Owns It

Once you’ve uploaded any information to Geni, they own it. While their terms of service say they don’t own your content, they really do. I can’t even find a way to delete an individual. What if I entered something and later discovered it was wrong? If I try to delete my account, I get only two options: “donate the profiles I manage to the Geni community” or transfer their management to someone else. Apparently, as soon as you merge with a single tree, your data is out of your control.

Conclusion

My conclusion is still pretty much the same as my original review, with some new gripes. This site is clearly for family networking and not for serious genealogy. As soon as you merge, you lose control of your data. If anyone makes a change, no matter how incorrect, it’s not always so easy to find and fix it. They claim not to own my data, but they give me no way to delete it from their server. I didn’t spend my own time and money to give my research away to a company that wants to make money from it. I was never so opposed to the one-big-tree-for-the-whole-world idea, except where a for-profit company uses freely volunteered information to make a profit from it. Not only is the information given freely, but some people pay them to give them information and they still try to make money from it.

While I’m glad I connected to a more distant part of my family through the site, and I’m able to scrape the information from the site slowly (still no download even more hours later), if Geni didn’t exist and the relatives were that interested in the family history, they would have just found my web site. After all, one of that group found my site before Geni ever existed, and plenty others have found it too.

Share on Facebook
Post on Twitter
Share on LinkedIn
Google Buzz (aka. Google Reader)
Digg This
Reddit This
Bookmark this on Delicious
Bookmark this on Technorati