<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: RootsTech &#8211; Day 3</title>
	<atom:link href="http://idogenealogy.com/blog/2011/02/13/rootstech-day-3/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://idogenealogy.com/blog/2011/02/13/rootstech-day-3/</link>
	<description>Genealogy and Life</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 27 Apr 2013 17:03:11 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Doug Blank</title>
		<link>http://idogenealogy.com/blog/2011/02/13/rootstech-day-3/comment-page-1/#comment-1061</link>
		<dc:creator>Doug Blank</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 03 Jun 2011 22:05:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://idogenealogy.com/blog/?p=1152#comment-1061</guid>
		<description>I did have to work it in between bedtime and the conference---too old to stay up too late! It should be easier to create a mashup, and the licensing issues are terrible. I wonder if they will do the challenge again next year? I sort of doubt it--- I still haven&#039;t received my award from FamilySearch. They don&#039;t seem to be too interested in tying up loose ends from last year...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I did have to work it in between bedtime and the conference&#8212;too old to stay up too late! It should be easier to create a mashup, and the licensing issues are terrible. I wonder if they will do the challenge again next year? I sort of doubt it&#8212; I still haven&#8217;t received my award from FamilySearch. They don&#8217;t seem to be too interested in tying up loose ends from last year&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Banai Lynn Feldstein</title>
		<link>http://idogenealogy.com/blog/2011/02/13/rootstech-day-3/comment-page-1/#comment-1044</link>
		<dc:creator>Banai Lynn Feldstein</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 31 May 2011 16:22:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://idogenealogy.com/blog/?p=1152#comment-1044</guid>
		<description>Thanks for your comments Doug. I didn&#039;t say the entries were sad, I said the results were sad. Only three entries to something that was looking like it was supposed to be a highlight of the conference? Also, when there are three entries and three prizes, it couldn&#039;t have been too difficult for me to win if I&#039;d entered. The only really challenging part, besides learning a new API in two days, was doing that *and* attending the conference. I chose to attend instead.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks for your comments Doug. I didn&#8217;t say the entries were sad, I said the results were sad. Only three entries to something that was looking like it was supposed to be a highlight of the conference? Also, when there are three entries and three prizes, it couldn&#8217;t have been too difficult for me to win if I&#8217;d entered. The only really challenging part, besides learning a new API in two days, was doing that *and* attending the conference. I chose to attend instead.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Doug Blank</title>
		<link>http://idogenealogy.com/blog/2011/02/13/rootstech-day-3/comment-page-1/#comment-1042</link>
		<dc:creator>Doug Blank</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 31 May 2011 13:33:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://idogenealogy.com/blog/?p=1152#comment-1042</guid>
		<description>&quot;I had an idea that I think was better than two of the three. If only I hadn’t wanted to attend the conference and sleep for 8 hours (spread out over 2 days), I probably could have won one of the prizes. But even though I read about it just before RootsTech started, I knew I didn’t want to take the time to try to program something for it. Sadly, I probably should have.&quot;

You can&#039;t win if you don&#039;t play:) You can&#039;t claim that the contestants&#039; entries were sad, and that you could have easily have won---that&#039;s just lame! Maybe the challenge was more challenging than you thought? Navigating through the licensing issues is partly what lead to my (winning!) project. But I wanted to make a larger point: if the big commercial entities don&#039;t give us what we want (with appropriate terms) then we can tweet user-to-user without them.

For more details on my project, see:

http://www.luxegen.ca/genealogy/rootstech-winner-programmer-software-challenge/</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;I had an idea that I think was better than two of the three. If only I hadn’t wanted to attend the conference and sleep for 8 hours (spread out over 2 days), I probably could have won one of the prizes. But even though I read about it just before RootsTech started, I knew I didn’t want to take the time to try to program something for it. Sadly, I probably should have.&#8221;</p>
<p>You can&#8217;t win if you don&#8217;t play:) You can&#8217;t claim that the contestants&#8217; entries were sad, and that you could have easily have won&#8212;that&#8217;s just lame! Maybe the challenge was more challenging than you thought? Navigating through the licensing issues is partly what lead to my (winning!) project. But I wanted to make a larger point: if the big commercial entities don&#8217;t give us what we want (with appropriate terms) then we can tweet user-to-user without them.</p>
<p>For more details on my project, see:</p>
<p><a href="http://www.luxegen.ca/genealogy/rootstech-winner-programmer-software-challenge/" rel="nofollow">http://www.luxegen.ca/genealogy/rootstech-winner-programmer-software-challenge/</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
